Rivers Coalition
Rivers Coalition Homepage How to Help the Rivers Coalition About the Rivers Coalition The Force - Rivers Coalition Newsletter Rivers Coalition Events
Our Lawsuit Rivers Coalition Media Learn more about our cause Links to our Members Contact the Rivers Coalition
 
 

 

Learn More


Once considered the most biologically diverse estuary in all of North America, here you can learn more about the complex issues that surround the degradation of the Saint Lucie River Estuary.  The environmental crisis we find ourselves facing did not occur overnight.  It has been over fifty years in the making.  
 
Here you can find out how it all began, what has been accomplished and what still needs to be done, what it means to the environment, to marine life, to the economy and to you.

 

Alarming Methylmercury Threat Exposed


 

 

Minutes

2013


 

Flash Video Documentary


See 8 minute Documentary : "Saving the St. Lucie Estuary"
You'll need the Flash Player plugin to view videos. Video may take a moment to load.

320x240: "Saving the St. Lucie Estuary" (smaller file size)

480x360: "Saving the St. Lucie Estuary" (larger file size)

 

Flash Video Documentary


View this 30 minute documentary by Dr. Grant Gilmore (divided into 4 parts).
You'll need the Flash Player plugin to view videos. Videos may take a moment to load.

Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4
approx 6 min approx 7 min approx 8 min approx 6 min

 

St. Lucie River's Decline


8 Part Report Series

By BUD JORDAN

Click Here to Read Entire 8 Part Series

Part 1  

The St. Lucie River was a freshwater river emptying into the brackish Indian River Lagoon before the first "permanent" inlet was opened by local businessmen in 1898.

Read More ...


 Part 2  

The St. Lucie River Initiative was formed in 1991 by local businessmen frustrated because the River continued to decline in environmental health. This despite 21

Read More ...

 

Part 3   

The first column of this series focused on the history of the St. Lucie River and reasons for its decline from 1900 through 1990. The second focused on how widely supported

Read More ...

 

Part 4   

In our last column we described how the extensive local efforts over the past 15 years to clean up the St. Lucie River have been completely negated by damages done the

Read More ...

 

Part 5   

Many wonder why excess Lake Okeechobee waters are not sent south to the Everglades. There are existing canals going from Lake O to the Everglades, and there

Read More ...

 

Part 6   

In our last column we discussed how federal protection of Everglades water quality resulted in construction of stormwater treatment areas (STA's), how Everglades

Read More ...

 

Part 7   

In the last column we discussed how providing the Everglades Agricultural Area with perfect irrigation and drainage controls all water management policy around it, and why

Read More ...

 

Part 8  

The main obstacle to obtaining a Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule that treats the coastal estuaries as valuable environmental and economic assets rather than as toilets

Read More ...

The Phosphorus Bomb


Date:  May 11, 2009 

      To:  Governor Charlie Crist, Florida Legislature, South Florida Water Management District, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection 

      From: Rivers Coalition 

      RE:  Phosphorus Bomb Presentation 

      Dear Everglades Restoration Leaders, 

The Rivers Coalition, representing 54 organizations in Martin and St. Lucie Counties, finds that action is urgently needed to curtail excessive uses and loading of phosphorus into our estuaries and water bodies. 

The immense and growing threat of damages due to excess phosphorus was detailed in a presentation to the Rivers Coalition by Florida Audubon’s Dr. Paul Gray. Following are factual highlights from the talk. 

His program entitled “The Phosphorus Bomb: Nutrients Are Sabotaging Restoration”

covered severe impacts of massive phosphorus loading,  including the fueling of toxic algae blooms, rapid accumulation of mud sediments, declining water quality, dead zones and loss of biological diversity in our waters, plus large impacts to economies that rely on clean waters.  Significant, and often senseless, problems due to past and present phosphorus applications by humans in the Okeechobee and St. Lucie watersheds were documented.   

The Rivers Coalition must conclude that not nearly enough is being done to curb the phosphorus problem.  Specifically, agricultural and urban-turf Best Management Practices are not designed to meet water quality standards, and they continued fertilizing at rates that make our watersheds more phosphorus enriched each year, at the very time we hope the phosphorus problem will improve.  Specifically, Best Management Practices are not designed to meet water quality standards, and they allow the continued addition of phosphorus to our watersheds, at the very time we are trying to recover from past dumpings.   Grossly excessive distributions of human solid wastes are ongoing, with some individual properties receiving more phosphorus each year than the entire annual load (TMDL) for Lake Okeechobee! 
 
 
The Rivers Coalition considers the continued loading of phosphorus in our watersheds and water bodies a massive degradation, and an emergency.  We request that you correct the ongoing phosphorus overloading by changes to BMP allowances in the Northern Everglades legislation, and through rule making by FDEP.  Residuals dumping must be banned and facilities ordered to switch their disposal to landfills, or preferably, to energy generation, similar to the City of Sanford’s efforts.  

Lastly, Everglades Restoration must have active support for finishing the River of Grass acquisition, in order to allow more area for treatment, storage and to facilitate moving Lake Okeechobee’s water away from the estuaries, where it is harmful, and into the Everglades, where it will be beneficial.   

We must all unite to defuse this extremely damaging nutrient bomb.  
 
 

Leon Abood and Board of Directors

Rivers Coalition

May 13, 2009 
 

PS:  A pared down version of Dr. Gray’s presentation is posted on the RiversCoalition.org  website (below).

 

 

Highlighted facts from

THE PHOSPHORUS BOMB 

  • Lake Okeechobee’s annual phosphorus goal (TMDL) is only 105 metric tons of phosphorus, but it’s watershed has an estimated 190,000 metric tons of “legacy” phosphorus that will create water quality problems for decades, if not centuries,
  • We continue adding 5,600 more tons of phosphorus to the Lake’s watershed every year, further exacerbating the legacy problem (5,600 tons is enough to meet Okeechobee’s TMDL for another 53 years),
  • Recent actual annual phosphorus loads to Lake Okeechobee have been 5-6 times the lake’s TMDL,
  • Recent phosphorus loads to the St. Lucie Estuary and Southern Indian River Lagoon also have in the hundreds of tons--more than the Lake’s TMDL—even though these water bodies are only 1/12th the size of Lake Okeechobee,
  • Agricultural and Urban Best Management Practices (BMPs) allow continued fertilizing at “agronomic rates” that are not designed to meet water quality goals and will allow ongoing loading and water quality problems, for example:
    • Sugar BMPs allow a net loading of perhaps 10 more pounds of phosphorus per year, meaning the 350,000 acres of sugar cane in the EAA likely are adding as much as 1,590 additional tons of phosphorus each year,
    • Urban turf BMPs allow fertilizing at about 100 times the level that a unit of land in Okeechobee’s watershed would ideally shed phosphorus
  • Land applications of residuals is putting vast amounts of phosphorus in these watersheds, for example:
    • St. Lucie County received almost 34,000 tons of Class B residuals in 2004, mostly from lower east coast counties, containing more than 1,000 tons of phosphorus (i.e., roughly 10 times the TMDL of Lake Okeechobee in one county that drains into the St. Lucie and Indian River Lagoon!),
    • Martin County does not allow class B residuals but received about 12,000 tons of Class AA residuals, with similar nutrient profiles, in 2006 and 2007,
    • Lake Okeechobee’s watershed annually receives at least 1,500 tons of Class AA and B residuals, roughly 15 times the lake’s TMDL,
    • Several individual  properties are receiving more than 105 tons of phosphorus in residuals each year (i.e., more than the lake’s TMDL),
    • And, FDEP does not even compile annual Class AA and B residuals reports detailing how much nutrient loads are occurring, or where.
 

Conclusions from Dr. Gray’s presentation 

  • Present projects, including the Indian River Lagoon South-component of CERP and Northern Everglades plans for Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie Watersheds, while meritorious and deserving of immediate funding, must include more nutrient control measures, specifically:
    • Residuals dumping of either Class B or AA (both have the same nutrient concerns) must be stopped.  Residuals can be used for biofuels and other beneficial products and should not be allowed to be harmfully dumped,
    • All phosphorus imports must be halted or greatly reduced, and if certain sectors cannot attain a nutrient balance, water quality treatment must be installed on-site to reach appropriate goals,
  • Much more Lake Okeechobee water must be sent south to the Everglades and away from the St. Lucie Estuary:
    • This requires the capacity to store and treat more than a million acre-feet of Okeechobee’s water in the EAA, which in turn requires finishing the River of Grass acquisition,
  • More water storage north of the lake is needed to improve water quality and the overall movement of water throughout the system.

 

 

 

Mucking Up Our St Lucie

Exerpt:

The St. Lucie Estuary water quality has been analyzed in relation to discharges into the
Estuary from Lake Okeechobee and from the surrounding St. Lucie watershed. Data has
been obtained from the South Florida Water Management District which records both its
own data collection as well as data from the US Army Corps of Engineers and USGS.
This data is available for download from the web and includes flow rates through the
major canal structures and water quality data at regularly sampled stations throughout the estuary. Additional water quality data from the Florida Oceanographic Society’s
Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Network has been analyzed and used to supplement the data from SFWMD. Computations of flow rates and loading have been conducted to show the magnitude of the water releases and their effects on water quality parameters in the estuary.

Read Full Report HERE (pdf) 35 pages!

 

 

 
Homepage | How to Help | About Us | Newsletter | Events
Lawsuit | Media | Learn More | Links | Calendar | Contact Us

Copyright ©2006 - 09 Rivers Coalition
Web Design & Photography TiffanyRichards.com